About
All feedback (89)
digital-paradise9 (407842)- Feedback left by buyer.
Past 6 months
Verified purchase
Great communication. A pleasure to do business with.
cellparts4less (9968)- Feedback left by buyer.
Past year
Verified purchase
Good buyer, prompt payment, valued customer, highly recommended.
digital-mart8 (197946)- Feedback left by buyer.
Past year
Verified purchase
Thank you for an easy, pleasant transaction. Excellent buyer. A++++++.
cellstores (21523)- Feedback left by buyer.
More than a year ago
Verified purchase
Good buyer, prompt payment, valued customer, highly recommended.
the90sbox (13293)- Feedback left by buyer.
More than a year ago
Verified purchase
Hope to deal with you again. Thank you.
1stopshopp (85821)- Feedback left by buyer.
More than a year ago
Verified purchase
Thank you for visiting our store, come again anytime!
Reviews (10)
Dec 16, 2010
Samsung vibrant excellent mobile
8 of 8 found this helpful Samsung Vibrant Overview
We've been spending some quality time with Samsung's Galaxy S phone lineup for the past few weeks, and our most recent candidate has been the Samsung Vibrant for T-Mobile. Just like the Samsung Captivate for AT&T we reviewed last week, the Vibrant is stacked with a Super AMOLED screen, 1GHz Hummingbird processor, 5-megapixel camera with 720p video, and Android 2.1. In fact, the Samsung Vibrant is nearly identical to the Captivate, save a few minor architectural differences and preloaded content. Let's just say James Cameron must be grinning and frolicking about like a little schoolgirl who just won the spelling bee, for T-Mobile hawks Avatar on the Samsung Vibrant like no tomorrow.
Samsung Vibrant Design
All Samsung Galaxy S phones share similar architecture, aside from Sprint's Epic 4G, which features a full QWERTY slide-out keyboard. So the Samsung Vibrant is strikingly similar to the Samsung Captivate and Samsung Fascinate. Compared to the Captivate, the Vibrant resides on the cheap side, utilizing a singular thin plastic panel to shroud the battery, 32GB capacity MicroSD card slot, and SIM card bay. On the AT&T Captivate, we get a nice metal faux carbon fiber back panel that is easy to slide out. The Samsung Vibrant's frail back panel snaps on rather awkwardly to the extent that we feared breaking the inner tabs right off.
On the bright side, the Samsung Vibrant is a sleek, light device with a contoured body that seemed to fit in our pocket a tad more ergonomically sound than the Captivate. We have the same sliding USB port enclosure found on high-end camcorders and 3.5mm Audio jack located on top, volume control on the left side, and Lock button on the right side. Simplicity is the name of the game here.
The Samsung Vibrant's AMOLED screen is one of its main attractions. Aside from a panel of four touch-sensitive buttons (Menu, Home, Back, and Search), the Samsung Vibrant relies solely on its screen to run the show. Haptic feedback is optional, and the screen itself is a benchmark in the mobile industry. The Samsung Vibrant's four-inch Super AMOLED capacitive touch screen has a WVGA resolution (800 x 480), but it's the phone's high contrast that sets it apart. The Vibrant's screen has an impressive 50,000:1 contrast ratio, which optimizes the dynamic range and proves ideal for watching movies and playing games. In fact, we compared the Vibrant's AMOLED to the iPhone 4's Retina display and made a few discoveries.
The iPhone 4 is better for basic navigation like reading and browsing while the Captivate is better for multimedia content like movies and games. It's worth noting that the iPhone 4's screen offers 326 pixels per inch (3.5-inch screen with 960 x 460-pixel resolution) while the Samsung Vibrant's screen has 260 pixels per inch (4-inch screen with 800 x 480-pixel resolution). We could see individual pixels and stepping lines if we looked very closely on the Vibrant's screen, but we couldn't see any pixels on the iPhone 4's screen. The Samsung Vibrant's Super AMOLED screen is still one of the tastiest in the mobile phone world, but the iPhone 4 still wins in the overall display department.
May 04, 2010
Samsung I8510
I8510 is one of the best phone out there, period. Regarding to photos / video is natural that if you tremble, the photos will outfocused, and lets face, most phones suffer from that.
Video quality is good, sound could be a lot better but it depends on what intentions they have when developing it. It will be different for each brand.
Regarding to battery life the I8510 samsung faces the same problem, since its OS is Symbian OS v9.3, Series 60 rel. 3.2, as may others out there.
Here are some advices.
Stop the wifi search, wifi is always turned on and searching for lans. If D-Pad on, turn it off, and the main thing is to disable auto-brightness off and turn the display brightness down. The 3G network maybe also something to turn off.
Here's the catch, the phone last now 2 days full but will never last more than that. Why ?
Nokia sabotage ... It ain't problem from the phone, its just that nokia OS doesn't allow better use from it.
Samsung, SE Vivaz for example, go and search comments for every phone with symbian in these days, all suffer what looks like a common sindrome ... Sabotage.
Aug 05, 2012
Excellent phone but small screen size.
1 of 1 found this helpful The iPhone 4S might look disappointingly like its predecessor, but Apple thinks beauty is only skin deep -- asking us to look beyond a familiar frame to the hollow of hopped-up hardware hiding inside its new smart phone.
One of those new components is the A5 chip, a powerful processor Apple reckons makes the 4S perfect for gaming and other processor-intensive activities. We've pitted the 4S against other devices in a few benchmark tests, so how does it fare?
The answer is very well indeed. We ran the SunSpider JavaScript benchmark test on a 4S, where it managed a score of 2,181.6 (lower is better). That's great compared to the iPhone 4, which managed 3,790.3 in the same test.
As you can see in the graph above, the 4S beat its predecessor, along with Samsung's Galaxy S2 and the HTC Sensation. It didn't quite beat our iPad 2 running iOS 5, though. There's no shame in that -- Apple's second-generation tablet is frighteningly fast.
That's a good indicator of how speedy the 4S is in general. We also tested the 4S' gaming potential using an app called GLBenchmark 2.1, specifically its Egypt test, which runs a game-style 3D scenario and monitors how the phone performs when it comes to pulverising polygons.
The 4S scored 6,568 in the standard version of this test (higher is better this time), destroying our iPhone 4's score of 1,621. The evidence was plain to see on-screen -- while the iPhone 4 struggled and stuttered in places, the 4S sailed through the test, rendering each detail without breaking a sweat, or dropping the framerate.
We also ran this test on our Samsung Galaxy S2, and it scored 4,757. That's a good score, and the phone handled the 3D test with very little stuttering, though it doesn't quite match the result we squeezed from our 4S.
We've also been playing demanding games such as Infinity Blade and Real Racing 2 on the iPhone 4S, and it handles both with ease. We suspect it will be a while before developers release apps that push the processing power of the 4S to breaking point.
On a purely anecdotal level, the 4S feels very snappy indeed, with apps opening quickly, and no lag when you swoop through menus or type out messages.
Do you have an iPhone 4S? Do you think the bump in processing power makes it worth getting, or has Apple dropped the ball by not tinkering with the phone's design? Let us know down in the comments, or on our Facebook wall.