About
All feedback (33)
holystone_au (2731)- Feedback left by buyer.
Past month
Verified purchase
Smooth transaction, thanks! 👍
prestige.nj (7282)- Feedback left by buyer.
More than a year ago
Verified purchase
Good buyer, prompt payment, valued customer, highly recommended.
rmt23456789 (6117)- Feedback left by buyer.
More than a year ago
Verified purchase
Good buyer, prompt payment, valued customer, highly recommended.
sweeforward (88889)- Feedback left by buyer.
More than a year ago
Verified purchase
Great communication. A pleasure to do business with.
Reviews (2)
Feb 07, 2011
enV3 = great choice . . . enV Touch = disappointment
40 of 40 found this helpful EnV 3 = great choice . . . EnV Touch = disappointment
EnV TOUCH vs. EnV 3 COMPARISON:
In general I really like LG phones. However, I originally purchased the enV Touch and a few months later decided to “downgrade” to the EnV 3.
TOUCH SCREEN: The touch screen on the enV Touch, quite honestly, stinks. It doesn’t feel natural to use at all. It is slow to respond and inaccurate. (if you’ve ever used or owned an Apple product with a touch screen then you know how a touch screen should feel).
SPEAKERS: The enV 3 speakers seem very strong and loud, where-as the enV Touch speakers are weak, and even at its highest volume setting, it’s difficult to hear most of the ringtones.
QWERTY KEYBOARD: The ‘Touch’ has a large keyboard, with large and well-spaced buttons. I thought this would be a good feature, but ironically, even with my larger, hands I noticed that the slightly smaller enV 3 keyboard is easier to use and I can type faster with it as opposed to that of the enV Touch.
FRONT DIAL KEYS: I very much like the large number pad on the outside of the EnV 3. The virtual dialing keypad on the touch would not have been a bad thing if the responsiveness of the touch screen was actually accurate.
VOICE QUALITY DURING A CALL: The Env 3 wins again on this point. Voices on the EnV Touch seem flat and muffled compared to the EnV 3. The EnV 3 has a fuller and richer sound quality on all its speakers.
So far the only negative thing I have to say about the EnV 3 is that the front screen is quite small and almost pointless. But, with all of its other clear advantages over the ‘Touch’, I’m still much happier with my EnV 3.
Feb 07, 2011
enV3 = great choice . . . enV Touch = disappointment
EnV 3 = great choice . . . EnV Touch = disappointment
EnV TOUCH vs. EnV 3 COMPARISON:
In general I really like LG phones. However, I originally purchased the enV Touch and a few months later decided to “downgrade” to the EnV 3.
TOUCH SCREEN: The touch screen on the enV Touch, quite honestly, stinks. It doesn’t feel natural to use at all. It is slow to respond and inaccurate. (if you’ve ever used or owned an Apple product with a touch screen then you know how a touch screen should feel).
SPEAKERS: The enV 3 speakers seem very strong and loud, where-as the enV Touch speakers are weak, and even at its highest volume setting, it’s difficult to hear most of the ringtones.
QWERTY KEYBOARD: The ‘Touch’ has a large keyboard, with large and well-spaced buttons. I thought this would be a good feature, but ironically, even with my larger, hands I noticed that the slightly smaller enV 3 keyboard is easier to use and I can type faster with it as opposed to that of the enV Touch.
FRONT DIAL KEYS: I very much like the large number pad on the outside of the EnV 3. The virtual dialing keypad on the touch would not have been a bad thing if the responsiveness of the touch screen was actually accurate.
VOICE QUALITY DURING A CALL: The Env 3 wins again on this point. Voices on the EnV Touch seem flat and muffled compared to the EnV 3. The EnV 3 has a fuller and richer sound quality on all its speakers.
So far the only negative thing I have to say about the EnV 3 is that the front screen is quite small and almost pointless. But, with all of its other clear advantages over the ‘Touch’, I’m still much happier with my EnV 3.